Economist: Digital Startups are Scooping Mainstream Media in Latin America

By: ICFJ | 07/19/2018
Taking Off: Over 770 digital media sites that serve the public interest are operating in Latin America, The Economist writes.

An article in The Economist spotlights how hard-hitting digital media startups are upending traditional news organizations in Latin America. It documents the trend with findings from SembraMedia, a nonprofit led by ICFJ Knight Fellow Janine Warner.

The article, “Latin America’s new media are growing up,” lays out how an increasing number of independent digital media startups in the region are calling out corruption - and how mainstream media are following their lead. The Economist emphasizes that these digital newcomers are the only independent news voice in authoritarian countries. In other Latin American countries, they are challenging entrenched media oligopolies. 

The story draws upon SembraMedia’s Inflection Point, the first major study of business models and market conditions faced by Latin American digital media entrepreneurs. The report, funded by Omidyar Network, has now been cited more than 155 times by news outlets in 15 countries, according to Warner, who co-founded SembraMedia in 2015 with Mijal Iastrebner. 

The Economist piece highlights digital media groups that were featured in the study, including ICFJ partner Connectas and Aristegui Noticias - led by former ICFJ Knight Award Winner Carmen Aristegui - for their role in the Panama Papers. It spotlights Chequeado for investigating corruption on both sides of the political spectrum, and Animal Político for reporting that influenced legislative change in Argentina. Both are winners of ICFJ’s TruthBuzz contest.

Warner, the executive director of SembraMedia, told The Economist that digital publishers can launch with “sweat equity alone.” And launching they are: SembraMedia has counted more than 770 digital media sites in 19 countries that “serve the public interest” and do not rely on a single corporation or party for revenue. Instead, new media organizations are diversifying their income through crowd-funding, grants and more.

These groups play a critical role in holding officials to account and providing independent coverage, even where the stakes are high. In Venezuela, for example, Efecto Cocuyo (Firefly Effect) - an ICFJ partner - has covered murder tolls and the black-market exchange rate.

Buoyed by their independent counterparts, traditional media are following suit and enhancing their own reporting. Chequeado’s fact-checking model has prompted newspapers in Brazil, for example, to create their own fact-checking teams. Others are reigning in self-censorship.

“The upstarts may be small,” The Economist writes, “but their impact is sizeable.”

Read The Economist article, and learn more about the Inflection Point study on IJNet.

Latest News

ICFJ-Backed Reporting Teams Are Probing the Sources Behind Election Lies

Investigative reporting teams across four continents are working with ICFJ’s support to expose the sources and money behind electoral disinformation campaigns, in a pivotal year for democracy when more than 2.6 billion people are expected to go to the polls.

Refusing to Be Silenced: The Importance of Exiled Media

Today, 71 percent of people live in countries that are considered autocratic. That’s up from 48 percent just a decade ago. The independent research institute at the University of Gothenburg in Sweden that published these figures also found that nearly four dozen more countries are “autocratizing.”

The implications of this are profound. In the most oppressive autocracies, freedom of expression, freedom of association, free and fair elections and other democratic values are absent. In others, they may be present in part but insufficient.

The Journalists Behind Afghan Fact Share How They Counter Disinformation

At the end of 2022, an Afghan journalist sent his colleagues an IJNet Persian article on fact-checking and verification. The piece came with a recommendation: that they should launch a website focused on fact-checking in Afghanistan.