2006 Burns Award Winner Analyzes War Strategies

By: Tom Albrecht | 06/01/2006

Jury member and Trustee Sabine Christiansen with the Arthur F. Burns Award Winner Markus Günther on the left and Kennan Award Winner Dr. Josef Joffe on the right.

Jury member and Trustee Sabine Christiansen with the Arthur F. Burns Award Winner Markus Günther on the left and Kennan Award Winner Dr. Josef Joffe on the right.

Washington Correspondent Dr. Markus Günther won the 2006 Arthur F. Burns Award for “Kriege ohne Sieger (Wars without Winners),” published in Badische Zeitung on August 18, 2006. On behalf of Germany’s Foreign Minister, Karsten Voigt, Coordinator for German-American Cooperation, presented the 2,000-Euro prize to Günther at the annual Burns Alumni dinner and lecture on June 1 in Berlin.

The award is usually given to one German and one American alumnus, but while many good stories were received from U.S. Burns alumni, none stood out as worthy of the 2006 prize.

In his story, Günther warned militarily powerful countries about the dangers of a quick military victory. Such victories, he wrote, lead to underestimating one’s opponent. Although we saw this in Vietnam, Günther explained that today’s ‘asymmetrical warfare’ far exceeds common guerilla tactics, but includes aspects of civil war, and can quickly lead to incalculable risks. The expected quick end to war is out of reach, and a military victory becomes impossible. The war’s goals remain unattainable.

While Günther based his article on fairly recent confrontations in Iraq, Afghanistan and Lebanon, his story reflects the European experience that ultimately led to the European Union. The current transatlantic debate focuses primarily on questions of military superiority. Günther’s story helps shift the terms of the debate through a European lens.

The 1,000-Euro George F. Kennan Commentary Award went to Dr. Josef Joffe, editor and publisher of Die Zeit, for his column “Nach dem Fiasko (After the Fiasco),” published in Zeit on March 9, 2006.

Dr. Joffe’s commentary piece impressed the jurors with its vivid language and extensive analysis of the power shift in the Middle East as a result of the Iraq war. Joffe views Iran as the unintentional winner of the “American fiasco.” In addition, he explores various issues including Germany’s role in nuclear policies with India, which undermine the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. Joffe’s analysis offers an expert lesson in the connections and correlations of world politics.

The jury for both awards was comprised of journalists Sabine Christiansen (ARD), Dr. Christoph von Marschall (Tagesspiegel), Claus Strunz (Bild am Sonntag), Florian Illies (Monopol) and Dominik Wichmann (Süddeutsche Zeitung), as well as Dr. Frank-Dieter Freiling (ZDF) and Nikolaus Graf Lambsdorff (Foreign Ministry of Germany).

2005 Burns Award Winners
2004 Burns Award Winners
2003 Burns Award Winners
2002 Burns Award Winners

News Category

Latest News

Sharon Moshavi on Journalism, Disinformation and Why Facts Still Matter

Sharon Moshavi, the president of the International Center for Journalists (ICFJ), recently joined the Ink and Insights podcast for a wide-ranging conversation on the future of journalism and the evolving information ecosystem. The interview, hosted by author and storyteller Sumit Sharma Sameer, touched on the growing role of AI in both enhancing and undermining journalistic work, the importance of audience-centric innovation and why young reporters must build subject-matter and tech fluency to stay resilient in the industry.

ICFJ Knight Fellow Sannuta Raghu Says “Fidelity to Source” is Vital When Using AI

Newsrooms globally have begun exploring ways to convert their journalism into different formats using AI: for example, from text articles to videos, podcasts, infographics and more. As they do so, the core challenge isn’t just accuracy – it’s rigor. Journalists strive to get facts right and attribute them clearly, avoid bias, verify claims, and maintain transparency. When AI is used to convert a work of journalism from one form to another, the same rigor may not carry over.

A Reporter's Guide to The History of Tariffs

For most of human history, governments have taxed goods crossing their borders. Tariffs — taxes levied on imports or exports — have financed empires, protected domestic industries, and punished foreign rivals. They’ve sparked wars, crashed economies, and redefined alliances. Yet today’s tariff war between the United States and the world doesn’t fit neatly into any of the old molds. Rather than being a tool to nurture domestic industry or fill government coffers, tariffs are now being wielded as weapons in a sprawling contest over global power and economic dominance.