Peering Into the Crystal Ball: Predictions and Trends for Journalism in 2022

By: Inaara Gangji | 02/07/2022

Trends in journalism are important for publishers and journalists to analyze in order to effectively prepare for a future that may look very different than our present.

During a recent ICFJ Pamela Howard Forum on Global Crisis Reporting webinarSam Guzik of the Future Today Institute, and Nic Newman from the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism shared their insights on what is shaping the news industry today, and how this will inform what is next for newsrooms and audiences.

“Our choices will determine if the future of journalism is hopeful or bleak,” said Guzik. “The future isn’t predestined. If we can identify a threat in the future we can also turn it into an opportunity, but that’s only true if we plan for it today.”

 

 

Current trends
Newman produces an annual research report for the Reuters Institute in which he analyzes the emergence of notable trends and offers predictions in media and technology. In the latest edition, Newman discussed the rise of podcasts and audio reporting; increasing revenue for newsrooms especially through subscriptions; acquisitions and bundling of companies; targeting of young people through visual content; hybrid newsrooms; and the popularity of newsletter-led publications and startups. Publishers are increasingly investing in these trends even as news readership overall has fallen.

“Some of this is cyclical after this extraordinary time for news. But, it also represents a fundamental challenge for publishers as consumption moves online, such as a loss of interest in news and politics by certain groups,” said Newman.

Audiences and publishers are also increasingly worried about information inequality, and reporting on important issues like climate change more effectively. There is a growing need for reporters and newsrooms to build skills for today’s industry needs and those of the future — especially as media organizations are already increasingly incorporating developments like artificial intelligence, he explained.

“Being essential doesn’t guarantee [journalism’s] future. Our industry is too important to assume we’ll be okay,” said Guzik.

How to respond and use information about trends is critical for the industry, added Newman: “We need to think about retention, [and] we need to think about growth. The industry is trying to focus on features they can deliver today [and] giving attention to core issues.”

 

Disruptions

The history of journalism is grounded in disruption. This is not a new development, explained Guzik, noting that it dates back to the invention of the printing press in the 1400s. In the past century, radio, television and the internet have all disrupted the media market. It is important to look within the industry, but also to trends outside of it to better prepare for changing times. 

Guzik and Newman highlighted several new trends to look out for, such as the rise of synthetic media like deepfakes, AI algorithms that can translate, transcribe and more, and the metaverse. These trends will impact not only how audiences consume news but also how reporting is gathered and disseminated.

Newman predicts that the ultimate battle will be between platforms and publishers. “The challenge is where to invest and how to stand out. It’s harder to create value, and the business model gets even harder [to maintain].”

[View past webinars and key quotes]

Planning for the future

Analysis of history, current trends and research can help media leaders make predictions to better prepare newsrooms for new developments, said Guzik. 

He predicts that emerging trends like natural language search, different kinds of AI, wearables and aggregation will impact not just newsrooms but every part of the value chain, from how people search for information to advertising. “It’s not enough to just observe what’s happening. I believe it’s possible to use this kind of analysis to make better choices today, but it starts with seeing trends and acting,” he added.

Newman noted that responding to change requires using available tools and developing skills for the future to better prepare business models and products for consumers and publishers alike. Reaching audiences in new, more personalized ways, developments in content creation and consumption, and new devices and platforms will change our world. They will lower barriers, but will also be unknown territory, noted Guzik. 

“Other industries are defining what expectations the consumer will have, and there’s a real risk,” said Guzik. “We’re not just responsible to use these technologies to propagate our businesses, but it’s also essential we use our knowledge as journalists to challenge these technologies and to think about what implication they have on society.”

Latest News

ICFJ Knight Fellow Sannuta Raghu Says “Fidelity to Source” is Vital When Using AI

Newsrooms globally have begun exploring ways to convert their journalism into different formats using AI: for example, from text articles to videos, podcasts, infographics and more. As they do so, the core challenge isn’t just accuracy – it’s rigor. Journalists strive to get facts right and attribute them clearly, avoid bias, verify claims, and maintain transparency. When AI is used to convert a work of journalism from one form to another, the same rigor may not carry over.

A Reporter's Guide to The History of Tariffs

For most of human history, governments have taxed goods crossing their borders. Tariffs — taxes levied on imports or exports — have financed empires, protected domestic industries, and punished foreign rivals. They’ve sparked wars, crashed economies, and redefined alliances. Yet today’s tariff war between the United States and the world doesn’t fit neatly into any of the old molds. Rather than being a tool to nurture domestic industry or fill government coffers, tariffs are now being wielded as weapons in a sprawling contest over global power and economic dominance.

Hans Staiger Award Winner Investigates Russian Soldiers Secretly Treated in Belarus Hospitals, Including Those Linked to War Crimes

Leaked data from the Russian Defense Ministry shook the story loose. A team of investigators found that during the first 21 months of the invasion of Ukraine, nearly 1,000 Russian soldiers were treated at Belarusian hospitals, including war crime suspects. These “secret patients,” as they were known, directly tied Belarus to Moscow’s war effort.