How Disinformation and Hate Fuel Online Attacks Against Women Journalists

Vicious online violence that seeks to silence women journalists and discredit their reporting is a growing problem – and one that is often tied to orchestrated disinformation campaigns, new research shows. Because of their race, sexual orientation and religion, some women face even more frequent and vitriolic attacks.

While 64% of all white women journalists who took part in a global UNESCO-ICFJ survey said they had experienced online violence, the rates were higher for those identifying as Black (81%), Indigenous (86%), and Jewish (88%). The data also shows that Arab women are substantially more at risk of experiencing offline attacks connected to online violence (53% compared to 20% overall).

These are among the key findings of a discussion paper published today based on a major UNESCO study carried out by ICFJ, which won an open bid to do the research. It draws on interviews with 173 international journalists and experts, over 900 survey responses, and a big data analysis of over 2.5 million social media posts directed at prominent journalists Maria Ressa of Rappler in the Philippines and Carole Cadwalladr, an investigative journalist and columnist in the United Kingdom.


Most of the women interviewed for the research experienced disinformation-based attacks designed to smear their personal and professional reputations, from accusations that they peddle “fake news” to the spread of false narratives about their personal lives and the use of “deepfakes.”

“I'm not in a war zone, I'm behind a computer,” said investigative journalist Brandy Zadrozny, who covers disinformation for NBC News and MSNBC in the U.S. “But the effect of online harassment and bad faith journalism from disinformation agents...is meant to silence us, meant to stop our reporting, meant to scare us. I think it does all of those things... And that takes a real toll on you.”

These attacks have a chilling effect on women's journalism and their freedom of expression: Nearly one-third (30%) of survey respondents who reported experiencing online violence said they self-censored on social media in response, while one in five (20%) described how they withdrew from all interaction online.

The report, “The Chilling: Global trends in online violence against women journalists,” is the largest study of its kind to date. Led by ICFJ Global Director of Research Julie Posetti, it presents an eye-opening look at the breadth, nature and consequences of this deeply disturbing trend, one that has worsened in the context of the pandemic.

The study was released ahead of World Press Freedom Day, underscoring how online violence is a critical journalism safety issue as well as a threat to democracy and, as the report’s authors put it, “cannot afford to be normalized or tolerated.”

The key findings are alarming. Among them: 

  • Over half (53%) of women respondents identifying as Arab said they had experienced offline attacks they think were seeded online, compared to 11% for white women and 20% overall.
  • The rates of online violence experienced by lesbian and bisexual respondents were 88% and 85%, respectively, compared to 72% of heterosexual women.
  • Of all women journalists surveyed, 41% said they had been targeted in online attacks that appeared to be linked to orchestrated disinformation campaigns. Many of the journalists interviewed who were targeted in this way report on far-right extremism and conspiracy networks. 
  • 13% of survey respondents and many interviewees said they had received threats of violence against those close to them, including children and infants.
  • Among women survey respondents, 37% said political actors – politicians, government officials or political party representatives – were the most frequent source of attacks and abuse.
  • Facebook was rated the most dangerous of the top five platforms/apps used, with nearly double the number of respondents rating Facebook “very unsafe” compared to Twitter. 
  • Partisan news outlets, media operating at the fringes of the political spectrum, and misogynistic journalists amplify and fuel attacks. This pattern is documented in the case of Cadwalladr, who has been subjected to four years of deeply sexist and misogynistic abuse online following her coverage of the Cambridge Analytica scandal.

As online violence against women journalists escalates, social media companies, news organizations and governments are struggling to respond effectively, highlighting the urgent need for policy reform. The report’s authors recommend that tech platforms develop better reporting systems for women journalists and their employers, that news organizations ensure their staff have access to meaningful support for online safety, and that political parties punish members who engage in online attacks against women journalists. There are 28 recommendations in the report.

“For too long, the emphasis has been on making women journalists responsible for their own defense and protection, rather than making the perpetrators and instigators, the platform enablers, and law enforcement and employers accountable,” the researchers conclude.

In addition to Posetti, the report’s co-authors are: Nabeelah Shabbir and Nermine Aboulez (ICFJ), and Dr. Diana Maynard and Prof. Kalina Bontcheva from the University of Sheffield. Twenty-four researchers in 16 countries conducted interviews with women journalists and experts around the world. The work builds on an earlier UNESCO-ICFJ publication on the theme, which found that three out of four women journalists surveyed (73%) said they had experienced online violence. 

ICFJ will be holding two virtual events to explore the research in greater detail. The first will be a joint UNESCO-ICFJ panel to launch the report on Friday, April 30, at 11 am EST/3 pm GMT during the global World Press Freedom Day conference. Click here to register for the event. It will feature Ahmed Imran of the Center for Countering Digital Hate, Ressa – who is the winner of the 2021 UNESCO/Guillermo Cano World Press Freedom Prize –  Posetti, and NBC’s Zadrozny, with ICFJ Knight Fellow Catherine Gicheru as moderator. The second will be a conversation with Ressa and Posetti on Thursday, May 6, at 10:30 am EST/2:30 pm GMT, with Google News Vice President Richard Gingras moderating. Sign up here.

Media contacts: Erin Stock (estock@icfj.org) or Clare O’Hagan (c.o-hagan@unesco.org)

Latest News

A Farewell Message from ICFJ President Joyce Barnathan: Banish Those Dark Scenarios

Before I step down after 15 years of serving as the president of the International Center for Journalists, I want to share a few thoughts with the wide network of journalists around the world I have been so privileged to work with.

Working with Data? Here's How to Verify Your Sources and Numbers.

The year 2020 wasn’t just dominated by the pandemic. It was also a year of open data. 

Many health-related organizations published daily and real-time updates about the spread of the virus around the world, circulating an unprecedented amount of numbers and figures. The challenge for journalists has been to analyze this information accurately, and communicate their findings to the public effectively.

For Argentina's Posta, Financial Organization Has Been Key for Media Outlet Growth

Posta was a young podcast production company when selected for the Velocidad media business accelerator program. Even though the organization was founded in 2014, the team behind Posta had not even calculated the company’s first balance when selected for Velocidad in early 2020. Posta founders, Diego Dell’ Agostino and Luciano Banchero, suspected they had a stable startup with a business model that could be improved. They also recognized it would be a challenge to optimize that business model, especially from a financial point of view.